On September 15, China officially voiced strong opposition to U.S. proposals urging G7 and NATO member states to impose “secondary tariffs” on countries importing Russian oil. The U.S. push is aimed at pressuring Russia by cutting off its energy revenues, which Washington argues are helping to sustain Moscow’s war in Ukraine.
Chinese authorities—including the Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) and the Foreign Ministry—rejected the idea, characterizing it as “unilateral bullying,” “economic coercion,” and a violation of international trade norms. They warned that such measures would disrupt global industrial and supply chains, threaten trade order, and infringe upon China’s “sovereign rights and interests.”
According to official statements, China sees its purchase of Russian oil as legitimate and lawful trade. The Chinese side emphasizes that it is not engaged in war, nor should its energy ties be judged via punitive tariffs, especially when they do not directly violate international law. Beijing’s messaging underscores that differences should be resolved through “equal dialogue and consultation,” not coercion.
The U.S. argument, as reported, includes proposals for tariffs ranging from 50% to 100% on imports from countries (including China and India) that continue purchasing Russian crude. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is pushing for allied cooperation, arguing that such tariffs would significantly reduce Russia’s ability to fund its war efforts, and urging European countries specifically to join in.
China has responded that if its interests are harmed by such policies, it “will resolutely take countermeasures.” Officials have also said that invoking sanctions or secondary tariffs over energy trade undermines WTO (World Trade Organization) principles and international trade stability.
Some European and other allied nations appear hesitant. While the U.S. is pushing for wide adoption, there is concern among certain G7 and EU members about the economic fallout—possible retaliation from China, disruption to supply chains, and impact on domestic markets. This making some reluctant to commit fully to such steep tariff proposals.
